Re: [manet] HELP HELP HELP
sanjeev barala <s_barala@yahoo.com> Tue, 31 May 2005 08:24 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dd23V-00021f-5d; Tue, 31 May 2005 04:24:57 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dd23T-00021Z-59 for manet@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 04:24:55 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA16387 for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2005 04:24:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web20123.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.225.251]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Dd2Mz-0004nI-Mz for manet@ietf.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 04:45:09 -0400
Received: (qmail 78220 invoked by uid 60001); 31 May 2005 08:24:47 -0000
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=hlfR0pJtw5pScOEJxpXVUb/H5zOGKz9CuK3jfyL9F3tMSDgj8CzwMoTTMFgrrPPytkjIg0TuJhU3L9ZOs3g85SM/euX83sgyYwjbpvwPs9luXw5QrNyamEs3WIFCUfH6B6/3DpnPl5vG43UxX4LbvYsIT+H4xaX/qn4G9PbAw6Q= ;
Message-ID: <20050531082447.78218.qmail@web20123.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [210.50.250.101] by web20123.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2005 01:24:47 PDT
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 01:24:47 -0700
From: sanjeev barala <s_barala@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [manet] HELP HELP HELP
To: sanjeev barala <s_barala@yahoo.com>, Deng Xiaoping <wender_frank6@yahoo.com>, manet@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20050524045733.93432.qmail@web20127.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 3a4bc66230659131057bb68ed51598f8
Cc:
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: manet-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: manet-bounces@ietf.org
Hi I am running a simple ns script with 128 nodes sending traffic(TCP) when it reaches 128 nodes it gives me following error. can somebody help me with possible solutions C:\tcl>ns 128node2v0d.tcl Number of nodes exceeds node-field-size of 7 bits while executing "error "Number of nodes exceeds node-field-size of $nodebits_ bits" (procedure "_o3" line 4) (Simulator check-node-num line 4) invoked from within "$self check-node-num" (procedure "_o3" line 18) (Simulator node line 18) invoked from within "$ns node" (file "128node2v0d.tcl" line 42) --- sanjeev barala <s_barala@yahoo.com> wrote: > HI All > Can anybody help me in this > > > Basic Project Specification > You are the Senior Engineer for a telecommunications equipment manufacturer in > charge of the design of a new Voice over IP (VoIP) capable router. The router is > intended for use by small ISPs with customers on multiple ADSL links or cable > modems. It will be capable of giving priority to voice traffic over data traffic. > Small ISPs typically have access to a limited range of uplink speeds. This router is to > have options for 2.048 Mbps and 34 Mbps. > The main design issues you need to resolve are buffer sizing and buffer management. > Because large buffers add to the cost and delay through the router, the buffer needs to > be as small as possible while still providing adequate service. > Your initial investigations into Voice over IP show the following: > •Voice traffic is transmitted using the UDP protocol while data traffic is > transmitted using the TCP protocol. > •Each voice stream generates a constant bit rate stream of packets with a fixed > packet size of 40 bytes (including UDP and IP headers and trailers) arriving at the > input buffer every 2.5 milliseconds. > •The maximum tolerable delay for voice traffic end to end is 500 milliseconds. For > your router, the maximum delay is 100 milliseconds. > •Data traffic is mostly made up of web page requests and emails. An average user > generates messages according to an exponential distribution with an average > interarrival time of 10 seconds with an exponentially distributed size of 40 kbytes. > •Most households comprise one or two data users and one or two VoIP users who > are active at any one time. > •Data traffic is fragmented into 8 kbyte packets. > •Most subscribers have a duplex link speed of 256 kbps. > •The Internet ‘diffserv’ architecture allows for a choice of scheduling – either FIFO > server schedule or a schedule giving priority to constant bit rate packets. The > priority scheme is to service the oldest voice packet, or service the oldest data > packet only if there are no voice packets in the queue. > You decide to develop a simulation program to help with the router design. The > typical scenario you wish to understand is where there are one or two concurrent VoIP > users and one or two data traffic users on each line. > Your router is to support as many lines as possible, subject to 99.9% of voice packets > being delayed less than 100 milliseconds. > You report on the following: > •Comparison of delay for different number of users user type (VoIP, data) > •Buffer size necessary to provide a loss probability for data traffic of 10-6 > •Comparison of delay for voice traffic with FIFO queueing and with priority > queueing. > > Extension 1 > You decide that it is important for the board to have confidence in your > simulation. You choose a number of techniques to verify it and include the results > of them in your report. > Extension 2 > You decide to experiment with different levels of packet fragmentation to see > what effect it has on voice delay. The IP standard specifies a maximum packet > size of 64 kilobytes per packet. You are using 8 kbyte packets. You report on the > effect on voice traffic delay of fragmenting the data traffic into packet sizes > ranging from 512 bytes up to the maximum of 64 kbytes. You are to report on the > effect of fragmentation with both FIFO and priority queueing. > Extension 3 > There is the possibility that link speeds will dramatically improve over the next > few years. Consequently, the board is undecided as to whether they should > produce a number of products with different buffer sizes and different uplink data > rates or whether a single buffer size with different interfaces will be satisfactory. > To help them make this decision, you decide to produce an extensive set of > simulation results for different household uplink speeds (256 bps, 512 bps and > 1024 bps), number of users and buffer sizes. You use the results to make a > recommendation as to which option should be chosen. > Extension 4 > Voice over IP across WLAN interface is becoming more popular. However, the > Board is concerned that the additional delay of the WLAN interface may have an > impact on the router design. You decide to investigate the effect of using VoIP > across an 802.11b wireless interface and how it affects delay from the user to the > ISP through the new router. > Households > Router > Internet > > Sanjeev > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site > http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ > > _______________________________________________ > manet mailing list > manet@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet > __________________________________ Discover Yahoo! Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online and more. Check it out! http://discover.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ manet mailing list manet@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
- [manet] How to get codes? Deng Xiaoping
- [manet] HELP HELP HELP sanjeev barala
- Re: [manet] HELP HELP HELP Brown Tim
- Re: [manet] HELP HELP HELP sanjeev barala
- Re: [manet] HELP HELP HELP sanjeev barala