Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification

Dean Bogdanovic <dean@voltanet.io> Mon, 28 November 2016 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dean@voltanet.io>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AB512A0DB for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:52:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=voltanet-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id shIb7sVqIBth for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:52:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wj0-x233.google.com (mail-wj0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c01::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63F2012A0DD for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:49:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wj0-x233.google.com with SMTP id qp4so129598159wjc.3 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:49:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=voltanet-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Em/rtBzMQPO+UWv/MLn7rBfTwKZMa012LSwrvvpIXkY=; b=ZGtmYVXFRqVrHDArZfQ3CHq+VOwn3oFfEb9NUU/LLVtyEpenHOBIJ5n25lBSuIVD4d zASEwO9yXzpFMaH7gLBf1+JGlJPAz/dZMJwZSYGJUr4KgwAof+pk+QnW5L/tpuWgDLNO MCdQEtg7e9ViSdcZXRSDcWf/fWYUrU0CGL4cBefdKwS6gOJso8iqW1lWS2wSNzXIWTn9 S5fWYrkuaVLI7GYLN+hOs8k1MyEuz4PRz4y4IJGjhQBXggdUrFSosANFpEXyV3qL/J70 A1odnbMvTa91LjuWx3EIfCUjA7gLOmBy2RNy2gZyT0H2t31L06KeQAP8v+UZQo85Sgzc owCQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Em/rtBzMQPO+UWv/MLn7rBfTwKZMa012LSwrvvpIXkY=; b=jqDSVxKl1P1Ka5rcnT5dX/C1kWtctn31Kl4Wneym6w2KOQ1ee+NFwIArr6m6MjXTGW GwKKW68bWqJPKEikapKXbJ7Upq/1iv+sY+DDAO/I6iDNcZoiGLULWrAMQxjFkSjlaMk7 sEIEXYutXGRaWy4kn49zAwVqHxPIXH6FTR8KU1sZquWZ4u/5QckAZ49AmVGYIaKfwiba eB/XNSEA0qlFBHobTF2SHUlV7UBfqJ7RClmcuNrlHpRHtegtNxmr4F7iwQSZyXAcsHG0 uJgK0FsENli7q35IaCxMmIfNL8VW1+MEdedreg+2t0x5XGyJNIwcCJpAOf4HXMdUkWtZ vxEw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC031Gqvz2we7xPNs5XmG1qHqmidlcWAbH1iaMb3k6rC4gdzA20ASjKgyCwHzjf1ijg==
X-Received: by 10.195.14.7 with SMTP id fc7mr22886703wjd.198.1480373388777; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:49:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.10.230] ([91.126.128.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c202sm517548wme.1.2016.11.28.14.49.41 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:49:47 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Dean Bogdanovic <dean@voltanet.io>
In-Reply-To: <fcc7ca09-dfe2-61ae-43bd-5e18354f9f98@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 23:49:37 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <5CDA80CF-E5DF-4151-99BC-ABF6687D22F5@voltanet.io>
References: <fcc7ca09-dfe2-61ae-43bd-5e18354f9f98@labn.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/eGW5BbrA1MUDrZgpyTmfpeP_3Vs>
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 22:52:27 -0000

Chairs,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

Dean

> On Nov 28, 2016, at 11:48 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> 
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
> 
> [NOTE: Adoption poll will be on the first draft, but authors have agreed
> that -01 WG revision will be based on both.]
> 
> Please state either:
> 
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
> 
> If yes to the above, please state either:
> 
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
> 
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> 
> Thank you,
> NETMOD WG Chairs
> 
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
> 
>