RE: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs over MPLS PSN ?

"Sasha Vainshtein" <Sasha@AXERRA.com> Wed, 28 November 2007 09:23 UTC

Return-path: <pwe3-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxJ8w-0007x0-Ug; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:23:42 -0500
Received: from pwe3 by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IxJ8u-0007uA-S9 for pwe3-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:23:40 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxJ8u-0007kT-CX for pwe3@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:23:40 -0500
Received: from mxa6.qos.net.il ([80.74.96.6] helo=mx05.qos.net.il) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxJ8t-0005K1-0c for pwe3@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:23:39 -0500
Received: from mail.axerra.com (webmail.axerra.com [80.74.100.75]) by mx05.qos.net.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC8637345F for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:23:35 +0200 (IST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs over MPLS PSN ?
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:23:18 +0200
Message-ID: <D849FF14B5E0B142ADFC9A92C509E9BB015264CE@tlv2.iprad.local>
In-Reply-To: <A0F29D84-CED9-4B7F-90C7-AF160B8D70D0@lucidvision.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs over MPLS PSN ?
Thread-Index: AcgxAXrMTcugO4dnRhK3jnZou7f5VQAndFOA
From: Sasha Vainshtein <Sasha@AXERRA.com>
To: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>, Raman Rangaswamy <ramanrs@hcl.in>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 07e9b4af03a165a413ec6e4d37ae537b
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org, "Vijayanand C - TLS, Chennai." <vijayc@hcl.in>
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1643743608=="
Errors-To: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org

Tom, Raman and all,
My understanding of the original question was (please correct me if I
got something wrong):

	Can LSP ping in VCCV be used to verify the PW connectivity if it
uses, say, MPLS-in-IP or MPLS-in-GRE for transport and the PW label
(bound to the appropriate PW Id or Generalized PW Id FEC) for PW
demultiplexing? And is such a verification required if the IP
connectivity to the remote device is OK?

IMHO the answer is:

*	
	Such a verification makes sense (the PW demuxing in the remote
box can go wrong even if the IP transport brings the PW packets to the
correct remote box)
*	
	LSP Ping in VCCV is the appropriate (and, AFAIK, the only) way
to perform it.

Did I miss something?
 
Regards,
                   Sasha

________________________________

From: Thomas Nadeau [mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:26 PM
To: Raman Rangaswamy
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org; Vijayanand C - TLS, Chennai.
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs over MPLS PSN
?




	
	Hi ,
	
	Can I conclude from the below draft sections that
	"LSP Ping should be used to test MPLS PWs over MPLS PSN and
	it does not applicable to test MPLS PWs over IP PSN(Say GRE
tunnel)."


VCCV should always be used to test the PW layer regardless of the PW 
type or encapsulation, and the appropriate tools for the lower layer to
test those. 
So use LSP ping/trace for MPLS LSPs, and ICMP echo for IP/l2tp 
tunnels/paths.




--Tom




	
	
	
	Draft: draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-15
	Section 3 : The CV types include LSP Ping [RFC4379] for MPLS
	PWs, and ICMP Ping [RFC0792] [RFC4443] for both MPLS and L2TPv3
PWs. 
	 
	Section 4: The various VCCV CV types supported are used only
when they apply to the
	context of the PW demultiplexer in use.  For example, LSP Ping
type should only be used 
	when MPLS is utilized as the PSN.
	 
	Thanks,
	Raman R
DISCLAIMER:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------

The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and
intended for the named recipient(s) only.
It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its
affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in 
this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily
reflect the opinions of HCL or its affiliates.
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and / or publication of 
this message without the prior written consent of the author of this
e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender
immediately. Before opening any mail and 
attachments please check them for viruses and defect.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
	
	_______________________________________________
	pwe3 mailing list
	pwe3@ietf.org
	https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
	


_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3