RE: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs over MPLS PSN ?
"Sasha Vainshtein" <Sasha@AXERRA.com> Wed, 28 November 2007 09:23 UTC
Return-path: <pwe3-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxJ8w-0007x0-Ug; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:23:42 -0500
Received: from pwe3 by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IxJ8u-0007uA-S9 for pwe3-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:23:40 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxJ8u-0007kT-CX for pwe3@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:23:40 -0500
Received: from mxa6.qos.net.il ([80.74.96.6] helo=mx05.qos.net.il) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxJ8t-0005K1-0c for pwe3@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:23:39 -0500
Received: from mail.axerra.com (webmail.axerra.com [80.74.100.75]) by mx05.qos.net.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC8637345F for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:23:35 +0200 (IST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs over MPLS PSN ?
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:23:18 +0200
Message-ID: <D849FF14B5E0B142ADFC9A92C509E9BB015264CE@tlv2.iprad.local>
In-Reply-To: <A0F29D84-CED9-4B7F-90C7-AF160B8D70D0@lucidvision.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs over MPLS PSN ?
Thread-Index: AcgxAXrMTcugO4dnRhK3jnZou7f5VQAndFOA
From: Sasha Vainshtein <Sasha@AXERRA.com>
To: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>, Raman Rangaswamy <ramanrs@hcl.in>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 07e9b4af03a165a413ec6e4d37ae537b
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org, "Vijayanand C - TLS, Chennai." <vijayc@hcl.in>
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1643743608=="
Errors-To: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org
Tom, Raman and all, My understanding of the original question was (please correct me if I got something wrong): Can LSP ping in VCCV be used to verify the PW connectivity if it uses, say, MPLS-in-IP or MPLS-in-GRE for transport and the PW label (bound to the appropriate PW Id or Generalized PW Id FEC) for PW demultiplexing? And is such a verification required if the IP connectivity to the remote device is OK? IMHO the answer is: * Such a verification makes sense (the PW demuxing in the remote box can go wrong even if the IP transport brings the PW packets to the correct remote box) * LSP Ping in VCCV is the appropriate (and, AFAIK, the only) way to perform it. Did I miss something? Regards, Sasha ________________________________ From: Thomas Nadeau [mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:26 PM To: Raman Rangaswamy Cc: pwe3@ietf.org; Vijayanand C - TLS, Chennai. Subject: Re: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs over MPLS PSN ? Hi , Can I conclude from the below draft sections that "LSP Ping should be used to test MPLS PWs over MPLS PSN and it does not applicable to test MPLS PWs over IP PSN(Say GRE tunnel)." VCCV should always be used to test the PW layer regardless of the PW type or encapsulation, and the appropriate tools for the lower layer to test those. So use LSP ping/trace for MPLS LSPs, and ICMP echo for IP/l2tp tunnels/paths. --Tom Draft: draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-15 Section 3 : The CV types include LSP Ping [RFC4379] for MPLS PWs, and ICMP Ping [RFC0792] [RFC4443] for both MPLS and L2TPv3 PWs. Section 4: The various VCCV CV types supported are used only when they apply to the context of the PW demultiplexer in use. For example, LSP Ping type should only be used when MPLS is utilized as the PSN. Thanks, Raman R DISCLAIMER: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any mail and attachments please check them for viruses and defect. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ pwe3 mailing list pwe3@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
_______________________________________________ pwe3 mailing list pwe3@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
- [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs ove… Raman Rangaswamy
- Re: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs… Thomas Nadeau
- RE: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs… Sasha Vainshtein
- Re: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs… Carlos Pignataro
- Re: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs… Carlos Pignataro
- RE: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs… Sasha Vainshtein
- Re: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs… Carlos Pignataro
- RE: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs… Raman Rangaswamy
- Re: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs… Mark Townsley
- Re: [PWE3] Is VCCV LSP Ping to test only MPLS PWs… AISSAOUI Mustapha
- [PWE3] PW OAM Mapping context: Is VCCV-Ping will … Raman Rangaswamy