IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] [6lo] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6man-multicast-scopes-02.txt

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Thu, 14 November 2013 05:52 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC5121E81BC; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:52:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.462
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.462 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.137, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tQzJn1gBW4Li; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:51:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E755221E81B5; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:51:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1802; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1384408317; x=1385617917; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=r7NaOU4jtZLwDGWirI+gPZOzrxthk/oChNOmmBa/TFU=; b=TkNt6WxlACmaBnC1PdU5K90KzfA/hy4NVQZtmbDMwKqZqDUSTzke4Hd1 7jHCfLpJLcMWMRmh89KLIitnNsOYuokMLZ/z6mqnKvc17lD6krsZ/ehsO 1DloXX0JgZn0H0hb1JLQ4mDFnjVqAXznwf8opRJdY3WctVjhlCGkIeIUw M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwFABtkhFKtJXG//2dsb2JhbABZgwc4U78rgSkWdIIlAQEBBDo9AgwEAgEIEQQBAQEKFAkHMhQJCAIEDgUIAYd4Db9OjieBBzEHBoMagREDmT+QXYFqgT6CKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,697,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="284611990"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2013 05:51:47 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAE5pk99007358 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 05:51:46 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.140]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 23:51:46 -0600
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Thread-Topic: [6lo] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6man-multicast-scopes-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHO4HNJWVU3mHovmE25ODDEakEb8pokOE8Q
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 05:51:46 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 05:51:00 +0000
Message-ID: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD841590CC4@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <20131112131626.28795.73885.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <81B53491-ABF4-4E98-B249-9CC652899B4C@cisco.com> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD84158AE17@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <9683EB80-69F2-42CC-BD89-1A0CC6398700@cisco.com> <52837CE4.60304@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <52837CE4.60304@innovationslab.net>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.201.167]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Routing Lossy networks Over Low power and <roll@ietf.org>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org IPv6 List" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Roll] [6lo] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6man-multicast-scopes-02.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 05:52:02 -0000

Hello Brian:

03 seems to derive from autonomic behavior, whereas 04 derives from admin. I do not see there a direct indication that 03 is contained in 04 though in the deployments I have in mind it would certainly be the case. Whether we want to enforce or on the contrary do not want to enforce the nesting is probably something we want to clarify.

Cheers

Pascal


-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Haberman [mailto:brian@innovationslab.net] 
Sent: mercredi 13 novembre 2013 07:22
To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Cc: Ralph Droms (rdroms); Routing Lossy networks Over Low power and; ipv6@ietf.org IPv6 List; 6lo@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lo] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6man-multicast-scopes-02.txt

Pascal,

On 11/12/13 5:04 PM, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote:
> The document has been accepted as a WG work item.  Check out 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-multicast-scopes-0
> 2.txt
> 
> 
> On Nov 12, 2013, at 5:00 PM 11/12/13, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello Ralph:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-droms-6man-multicast-scopes-02 does not seem to contains the section you're inlining. The only diff I found was -specific going -local.
>> As we are at it, would we be ahead of ourselves if that the draft also specifies that a collection of RPL DODAGs of a same instance federated over an isolated backbone (such as a VLAN) in an 04 ?.
>>
>> If I may add, there is kind of an habit that scopes are nested. Seems that we are going away from that assumption and maybe it would be good to have a sentence saying that?
>>

Scopes are still nested.  See RFC 4007.  Are you saying that this document is changing that?

Regards,
Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email