IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] WGLC for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-03

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 02 August 2014 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5201B29A7; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 13:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9GNeIqg_xcUc; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 13:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22e.google.com (mail-qa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30A421B29A2; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 13:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id v10so5352479qac.5 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 02 Aug 2014 13:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=6dmX27P7oPeXR3Xuakm7AqBZBpkaDo0yg55z08VUPOc=; b=xOvohFOZQb+4iB7MOnoItGsHZuc/WrBlYtqGi0PFF/ZVGUPw72RjtOr4XvN2gU3seJ glJVBw00+RMiMt3Drrj6BcIgpreMdU38En8zMKkTfXbjZ4Wia5A5UJaFQKK6ngzRDLcC BVgHhOV8dLVCEfYa6KaA75r5ma994SQf0Aponkr8V8/mT5kTI8xPa/bCx2nCko+ymazc LB5DwIsOswB/OGavHT18aSRmSu1mLxXsnh0SR2tDQXbey+wvOxdduGsjdTAaioo/LvMI 1apsqC7Zbk9By8m4VikBGZW1AnnSlFY/EmEUEZL/eXFt+hvwTIgYu+ikYFxFB3vEL7oC jaZA==
X-Received: by 10.140.94.70 with SMTP id f64mr21051974qge.64.1407012998981; Sat, 02 Aug 2014 13:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:6:6780:636:f96f:9ecd:5aaa:13b2? ([2601:6:6780:636:f96f:9ecd:5aaa:13b2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o89sm13796116qgo.1.2014.08.02.13.56.37 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Aug 2014 13:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-B614815F-7F8B-43E7-995E-AC221C0662B2"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11D257)
In-Reply-To: <C6FECB27-1A70-4AF7-B4BE-2218B0344C3F@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 16:56:36 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <2F2D5FEA-51E0-4F04-8A54-2493ECB73757@gmail.com>
References: <CAP+sJUeLa9r2otVv41ezg1Om--XzM84w3MOvCyn7bawDA7Oqgw@mail.gmail.com> <69656203-C009-4ABE-BCAD-17622058FEB9@cs.stanford.edu> <53D84C2C.9050709@gmail.com> <140F7EAF-B3B2-4F39-B676-5901457BF494@cs.stanford.edu> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD842D04850@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <09EC423F-FC09-495D-9B48-0DABFA4C19F6@cs.stanford.edu> <C17BE08C-E179-472D-A349-B6CB8ADDCDF5@cisco.com> <3211.1407006535@sandelman.ca> <C6FECB27-1A70-4AF7-B4BE-2218B0344C3F@cisco.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/szD8JaChI_kRow-TXcInZmRTV2s
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] WGLC for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-03
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 20:56:42 -0000


> On Aug 2, 2014, at 4:48 PM, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> That sounds right, Michael,

I agree that "updates 6437" is a right thing to do.

> though slightly on the overkill side.

I disagree that it is overkill.  In my opinion, draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-RPL pretty clearly contradicts RFC 6437, so "updates 6437" is an appropriate action.

>  And this is consistent with what Brian suggested. This can be added during the rfc editor process I expect?

It should be added as soon as possible, certainly before it goes to the IESG.  In my opinion, the change might warrant a new or extended WGLC; that action is up to the chairs, of course.

- Ralph

> 
> Pascal
> 
>> Le 2 août 2014 à 21:09, "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> a écrit :
>> 
>> 
>> Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
>>> OTOH you need to understand that there is no need for a bis to update a
>>> MUST in an RFC. We recognize the imperfection in our work and are
>>> always ready to revise and amend after due consideration.
>> 
>> Perhaps this document UPDATES 6437 then?
>> 
>> --
>> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email