[rrg] draft-narten-radir-problem-statement-05.txt

Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Thu, 18 February 2010 00:38 UTC

Return-Path: <narten@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9700928C2AA for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:38:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.768
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.832, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JaFcuKHtontc for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:38:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com (e35.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.153]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BC228C1DC for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:38:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.226]) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o1I0ahQx029823 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:36:43 -0700
Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (d03av05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.85]) by d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o1I0eEJl175830 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:40:14 -0700
Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o1I0eDkx030260 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:40:13 -0700
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (sig-9-48-37-10.mts.ibm.com [9.48.37.10]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o1I0eCQC030243 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:40:13 -0700
Received: from cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.12.5) with ESMTP id o1I0eAr0027055 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:40:12 -0500
Message-Id: <201002180040.o1I0eAr0027055@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: rrg@irtf.org
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:40:10 -0500
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [rrg] draft-narten-radir-problem-statement-05.txt
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:38:42 -0000

Hi.

With the recent thread on route scaling, now might be a good time for
folk on this list to have a fresh look at the "route scaling problem"
document below. This was put together by the Routing & Addressing
Directorate (http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/group/radir/) and is a joint
effort by all of its members.

The document has been sitting for a while, but we are now looking at
it again with the goal of getting it published as an Informational
RFC. In order to do that, we really need folk to review it and either
point out its shortcomings, or indicate that it's a useful document to
publish as is.

Thanks!

> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> 
> 	Title           : On the Scalability of Internet Routing
> 	Author(s)       : T. Narten
> 	Filename        : draft-narten-radir-problem-statement-05.txt
> 	Pages           : 25
> 	Date            : 2010-02-17
> 
> There has been much discussion over the last years about the overall
> scalability of the Internet routing system.  Some have argued that
> the resources required to maintain routing tables in the core of the
> Internet are growing faster than available technology will be able to
> keep up.  Others disagree with that assessment.  This document
> attempts to describe the factors that are placing pressure on the
> routing system and the growth trends behind those factors.