IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] FOR REVIEW: Vulnerability Assessment Scenario Issue #2 - Clarifying Vulnerability Detection Data

Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com> Fri, 27 May 2016 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@yaanatech.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA8A12D607 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 May 2016 09:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6lxCsedvqB3u for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 May 2016 09:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sc9-admin2.yaanatech.net (63-128-177-42-static.dzbja.com [63.128.177.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16A712B011 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 May 2016 09:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from extmail1.yaanatech.com (extmail1.yaanatech.com [63.128.177.51]) by sc9-admin2.yaanatech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD741BA; Fri, 27 May 2016 16:02:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.51] (pool-173-67-205-17.clppva.fios.verizon.net [173.67.205.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by extmail1.yaanatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8FF58086; Fri, 27 May 2016 15:57:48 +0000 (UTC)
References: <BY2PR09MB10783AE74BC4160A0556A76FA5480@BY2PR09MB1078.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <C22588AD-3118-44AB-BD4E-ECA390FB5EB5@gmail.com> <BY2PR09MB10780BE9FEA949D7559F29DEA54F0@BY2PR09MB1078.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <BN1PR03MB1230181B45E4DE208FBE57DAF4F0@BN1PR03MB123.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <68B827CB-A5D6-4D00-96AA-56885540D413@gmail.com> <BN1PR03MB1238F8C8F3228F48D2C33EDAF400@BN1PR03MB123.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CFB5931F-DD36-47BF-B694-3979D2E15D51@gmail.com> <BY2PR09MB10780E23D15C56B18FC9ECA1A5410@BY2PR09MB1078.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <2d33f983-d9cd-e4c8-c22d-11a2c78e870c@yaanatech.com> <BY2PR09MB10787878B52FE1FBE0494B16A5410@BY2PR09MB1078.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <BY2PR09MB1078E1BA0BCCF04187C0927BA5420@BY2PR09MB1078.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Haynes, Dan" <dhaynes@mitre.org>, Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>, Michael Godsey <mgodsey@microsoft.com>
From: Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com>
Organization: Yaana Technologies
Message-ID: <aba82057-9fd6-6b3b-a93f-1204bd2f6de4@yaanatech.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 12:02:53 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR09MB1078E1BA0BCCF04187C0927BA5420@BY2PR09MB1078.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------6E216859C412D93B0D4D13B3"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/mxLc4qJXGpZJqdFtBToNInYhIDA>
Cc: "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sacm] FOR REVIEW: Vulnerability Assessment Scenario Issue #2 - Clarifying Vulnerability Detection Data
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tony@yaanatech.com
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 16:02:56 -0000

With charity beginning at home so to speak,
you certainly want to cite the copious materials
in the lisp working group of IETF.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lisp/charter/
There are some great current presentations
from the most recent lisp WG meeting.

There is rather considerable material
available with a simple search on LISP
use in virtualized networks.  See, e.g.,
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-lisp-7.pdf
Cisco folk have some great tutorials.  It's
already been embedded in two NFV specs
out of EVE and SWA:
GS NFV-EVE 005 V1.1.1 (2015-12)
GS NFV-SWA 001 V1.1.1 (2014-12).

My LISP friends say that LISP traffic exceeds
IPv6, but that not verifiable.

--tony


On 2016-05-27 6:23 AM, Haynes, Dan wrote:
>
> Just as a heads up, I added a tracker item to create an IE for LISP 
> addresses and bindings [1].
>
> If you have any information (references, etc.) that would be helpful 
> in creating the IE or thoughts on how you might want it to be 
> represented, please include them in the tracker.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email