RE: [Seamoby] Concensus Call:Reaching Closure on Paging Decision

Hi all,
After all these discussions, I feel that the selection or reselection of
any particular proposal as a starting point seems like an impossible
feat to me.  Particularly because none of them have met the requirements
completely, not even draft-renker.  I can comment on this because I was
part of the evaluation team and I was the evaluator for Renker proposal.

For the next step, I join Stefano and Bechet in proposing a team to
design the protocol from scratch.  Although it is not clear, I assume
this consensus call covers this option also.

Thanks,
Srini

-----Original Message-----
From: ext James Kempf [mailto:kempf@docomolabs-usa.com]
Sent: 17 January, 2002 1:18 PM
To: seamoby@ietf.org
Cc: sob@harvard.edu; Allison Mankin
Subject: [Seamoby] Concensus Call:Reaching Closure on Paging Decision

All,

Pat and I made a selection for what to start with, not what to end with.
The WG will determine what the final technology looks like.

1) If you want to support or disagree with the selection of the starting
 ID, say so now please.

2) If there is not consensus that we should re-open the selection phase,
then we will move forward based on the selection in the next few days.

Thanx.

            jak

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby