Re: [Sip] mib-08

It's probably better not to ask exactly how much implementation there is
going to be off this :-)

On 11/9/04 11:36 AM, "Steve Langstaff" <steve.langstaff@citel.com> wrote:

> KL: "we need to move the I-D forward so we can get a RFC that can get some
> implementation experience."
> 
> I thought that the I-D phase was the time to get the implementation
> experience. Is it your intention that the RFC will be "Experimental" or
> "Informational" before getting this implementation experience, and then become
> a standard afterwards?
> 
> --
> Steve Langstaff.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> Kevin Lingle
> Sent: 08 November 2004 17:26
> To: Cullen Jennings
> Cc: sip@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Sip] mib-08
> [snip]
> 
> we need to move the
> I-D forward so we can get a RFC that can get some implementation
> experience.
> 
> kevin

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip