IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-central-control

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Mon, 22 May 2017 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E5B128AB0; Mon, 22 May 2017 13:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FPdGKzGDVr8B; Mon, 22 May 2017 13:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x231.google.com (mail-vk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3F2D1273B1; Mon, 22 May 2017 13:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id x71so47703429vkd.0; Mon, 22 May 2017 13:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WexyT/v58cxBG7sAopbiT9J6YZQMB18KlM4MF3OL04c=; b=fxl4Q9t8JraAiGotfIybZS1vTuP8uEXY2NW/HcoiJ/PCU3eQzCqAJg/uSmyRZ4thKa AUUQ54/GIwjSfrkwoswU4RGXoTUOd2SReYFaL4ARnKHBOfvI/soPyLJcs2LwzPqbp8z/ uXCx36+IkYvnup3McJV14e4+CAxCX0k2A9+bo1SQiGAKcl3XqEesP1/AhMVOO/LaNzcY I4hzJnrYIgvWamru+mNoQYfNhPx1NOMHKWBxYQYzwJOawfODhR1whCI+uD84ZN76w6Fx BP5MDzV6Nl7AKCPD/AlSFoaW5ky3Qg2Mu6gHM0JVixt9AYuzrIiJBKrBg1I6ha/L0Foa g7MQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WexyT/v58cxBG7sAopbiT9J6YZQMB18KlM4MF3OL04c=; b=qGc3ZEYxpWPP4UjWsOjAEoPnxt3OoSgWEykJjkJQzq+6eya97XjyrTwLEQw1mPktX+ 08CRFFS7mNsUF1Kyc4GOBeY4EmKgGLJr8mvTL/aPflW4P0Et/44OPdYsj3Ol4UH7hhDA 8Gq1E9/FjgYHg9Fsxf4RTQnH8jeH+4o9VdKx0RT3wSlziCqTBiGuE7U6Cya0bMv5Tb8K e7Y7Wm7zAQw+PkzbUhllDDs5AGCy7xO0IZvpdXRm5sTZrXsBykNxeL4kB6mMbH3HrXbr L/aUtCb/SpI27l0o2NULFm6WhDAHMFz4qXPtQWjOUJ4wvMIoVWek0gA3ctwJaQuMPjsM GD7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcC4RjKnzWBCcbcyWIryT04EgP3Zs72ypAbJDG9jTLenwRnWmoRa ZimvPyS+rQoSrm/yJYJ1Vv3X7c8YRA==
X-Received: by 10.31.178.151 with SMTP id b145mr7877900vkf.104.1495486576036; Mon, 22 May 2017 13:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.147.193 with HTTP; Mon, 22 May 2017 13:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 16:56:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTvckqLVww7wQTVu6a==B_iG6=Fs5EX=3NbVNJyQOQp6Aw@mail.gmail.com>
To: afarrel@juniper.net, quintin.zhao@huawei.com, lizhenbin@huawei.com, chao.zhou@cisco.com, cmargaria@juniper.net, scheruathur@juniper.net, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>, Daniel King <daniel@olddog.co.uk>, ihussain@infinera.com, Anurag Sharma <AnSharma@infinera.com>, eric.wu@huawei.com
Cc: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143ff2e21918e0550231ab9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/XJf3UjVwmljXhaDN65RZHNZPydM>
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-central-control
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 20:56:19 -0000

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email