Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec

"Pacella, Dante J" <dante.j.pacella@verizon.com> Tue, 06 June 2017 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <dante.j.pacella@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B21129474 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 07:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=j62rfa9k; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=verizon.com header.b=o3O8g2gE
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hHiltboSDkJ2 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 07:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omzsmtpe02.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe02.verizonbusiness.com [199.249.25.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F6D3129456 for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 07:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=verizon.com; i=@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1496759810; x=1528295810; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=QqOBVaCGVfIw5ZL/lKY7LJU0Y7eORWuPOVUg87O57EU=; b=j62rfa9kcV+UN8+98ekS07E8MvyhzMDz417OfBCcvk5V6vKQmYsj2rna JleY2GRKIG1bDIao1UU17GxnIp8HLi+FhKQCM6k8pQvoX01sR7yMDDUEg 8L9xkF6o9o2Sa9Ppq8k0EVQVEyVx89Awu0IPLYasGzJNWsD3xCqda/Iyi s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false
Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi03.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.145]) by omzsmtpe02.verizonbusiness.com with ESMTP; 06 Jun 2017 14:36:48 +0000
From: "Pacella, Dante J" <dante.j.pacella@verizon.com>
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,306,1493683200"; d="scan'208,217";a="365781669"
Received: from nord.tdc.vzwcorp.com (HELO Nord.verizonwireless.com) ([10.254.88.187]) by fldsmtpi03.verizon.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 06 Jun 2017 14:35:53 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=verizon.com; i=@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1496759753; x=1528295753; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=QqOBVaCGVfIw5ZL/lKY7LJU0Y7eORWuPOVUg87O57EU=; b=o3O8g2gEUOAZTKplH/Dz6wlUZUFF9HcP3jit6j94KGHyPwlqKompQ+mI orbwdvyUJGV/S7p0Zi7+k6WfE1L3lN554YofmVkk24hKUfFkwXW+9qtK8 pCBzcoOsLeGHUpLBl3d6zVbGNmHfnX7P3KAbggdO6gRHi/z2UiBW0ZAJd 0=;
Received: from gaalpexhub2.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([10.191.138.196]) by Nord.verizonwireless.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 06 Jun 2017 10:35:53 -0400
Received: from OMZP1LUMXCA07.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (144.8.22.180) by GAALPEXHUB2.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (10.191.138.196) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.406.0; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 10:35:42 -0400
Received: from OMZP1LUMXCA09.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (144.8.22.182) by OMZP1LUMXCA07.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (144.8.22.180) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:35:40 -0500
Received: from OMZP1LUMXCA09.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([fe80::b9a4:fd3d:5678:6d5e]) by OMZP1LUMXCA09.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([fe80::b9a4:fd3d:5678:6d5e%18]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 09:35:40 -0500
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
CC: Vishnu Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>, Ina Minei <inaminei@google.com>, Rob Shakir <rjs@rob.sh>, "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [E] Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec
Thread-Index: AQHS3lriJkTdEHOkXkyctf5QkuVNUaIX+GQA
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 14:35:40 +0000
Message-ID: <D55C35DE.6FCFC%dante.j.pacella@one.verizon.com>
References: <22a1fc0c-d362-47b5-d4fd-e30ec9da0105@labn.net> <CA+YzgTvBosVGKtik1uBb9iLzeOXAuyqcCtqvaLL87pXWQOW1fw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTvBosVGKtik1uBb9iLzeOXAuyqcCtqvaLL87pXWQOW1fw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.1.161129
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.144.60.250]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D55C35DE6FCFCdantejpacellaoneverizoncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/E90mFjw0stro4i3n-1A8wkKhWkY>
Subject: Re: [Teas] [E] Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 14:36:53 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft (other than Pavan's disclosure).

Dante

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, June 5, 2017 at 8:21 PM
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net>>
Cc: Vishnu Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net<mailto:vbeeram@juniper.net>>, Ina Minei <inaminei@google.com<mailto:inaminei@google.com>>, Rob Shakir <rjs@rob.sh<mailto:rjs@rob.sh>>, Dante Pacella <dante.j.pacella@one.verizon.com<mailto:dante.j.pacella@one.verizon.com>>, "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com<mailto:tsaad@cisco.com>>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org>>
Subject: [E] Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec

Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft. And yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2643/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_ipr_2643_&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=3v2kN75t0hArjqO2VR1eCOcVUAfUXf1qzQ97QLZKn0c&m=coCs_U_PeB954pSJlacIIPPi7Qq0vxeFio_wr-D3HnE&s=UMdwJlKaLYMbiL-BcV5KzxGPnQtAAS0Je-TS77vl5cc&e=>

Regards,
-Pavan (as co-author)

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote:
Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__trac.tools.ietf.org_group_iesg_trac_wiki_IntellectualProperty&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=3v2kN75t0hArjqO2VR1eCOcVUAfUXf1qzQ97QLZKn0c&m=coCs_U_PeB954pSJlacIIPPi7Qq0vxeFio_wr-D3HnE&s=RabQx2ZFi8wlf7Afpwad-jOhnzckZxlAgp_xGT8PdLM&e=>.

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.




_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org<mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_teas&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=3v2kN75t0hArjqO2VR1eCOcVUAfUXf1qzQ97QLZKn0c&m=coCs_U_PeB954pSJlacIIPPi7Qq0vxeFio_wr-D3HnE&s=yNqKtXZidvgBFgG_JcIpz0sFgCnFkRHseZbI9BsHl2I&e=>