IETF Logo Mail Archive

RFC 5006 status

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 17 March 2010 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5EC03A6C50 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.006
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.241, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5BJjYgsDSNW4 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A96D3A6C3E for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1Nrv4M-000N1y-Ro for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:22:02 +0000
Received: from [171.68.10.87] (helo=sj-iport-5.cisco.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <fred@cisco.com>) id 1Nrv4J-000N1M-V4 for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:22:00 +0000
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEADuQoEtAaMHF/2dsb2JhbACbBHOfJZhohHYE
Received: from syd-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.104.193.197]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2010 15:21:57 +0000
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,657,1262563200"; d="scan'208";a="62342677"
Received: from hkg-core-1.cisco.com ([64.104.123.94]) by syd-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2010 15:21:57 +0000
Received: from [10.149.3.219] ([10.21.119.236]) by hkg-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2HFLiNo001209; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:21:49 GMT
Subject: RFC 5006 status
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BA0EC66.3010403@piuha.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:18:44 -0400
Cc: Lindqvist Kurt Erik <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>, 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Dave Thaler <dthaler@windows.microsoft.com>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, jjeong@cs.umn.edu, luc.beloeil@orange-ftgroup.com, smadanapalli@gmail.com, Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <308C7176-40DF-4F82-AC2D-A4EAC6E2766B@cisco.com>
References: <4B9DFC7D.3070704@piuha.net> <E47F4C05-D53D-4E04-B15F-07752E9D9A7E@cisco.com> <4B9E96E2.10108@piuha.net> <1315FBDA-12A2-4C16-B66F-CBD4802E6766@cisco.com> <4BA089F9.5010006@piuha.net> <65B6B54D-98AD-4772-B2E0-6E2CA8DE76C0@cisco.com> <419DB14D-BFDC-4118-BB3E-F4D9570D927D@kurtis.pp.se> <A5AB4B97-11BA-4D27-860C-3811D075BFC6@cisco.com> <4BA0EC66.3010403@piuha.net>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

This is a structured question for the community.

Jari Arkko tells us that he is getting requests from various sources to take RFC 5006 to Proposed Standard. It is now experimental.

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5006.txt
5006 IPv6 Router Advertisement Option for DNS Configuration. J. Jeong,
    Ed., S. Park, L. Beloeil, S. Madanapalli. September 2007. (Format:
    TXT=26136 bytes) (Status: EXPERIMENTAL)

(1) Please take a look at the document in the next few days; if you have comments on it (eg, you think it should be changed in some way), please comment to v6ops.

(2) Vendors, please advise on implementations. Are there any? Has interoperability been demonstrated?

(3) Operators, enterprise and/or service provider, please advise on deployment experience.


I'm adding a brief discussion to the agenda Monday morning with a view to getting a quick thumbs-up/thumbs-down to advise Jari, who can then take that to 6man later in the week if appropriate.



BTW, I have had a flurry of email related to the agenda. The current agenda may be found at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/agenda/v6ops.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email