[websec] draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-03 reference nits
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 29 December 2011 12:58 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E064521F854D for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 04:58:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.832
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.832 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.233, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N5pKnL3GyFaD for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 04:58:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C27321F852E for <websec@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 04:58:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2011 12:57:59 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp005) with SMTP; 29 Dec 2011 13:57:59 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/D+MVy4qLDGIzrFf0DgdicmvwVWe08IZdYTAbHIV OEcfznVTBZU/TC
Message-ID: <4EFC63D3.6000903@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:57:55 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: websec <websec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Subject: [websec] draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-03 reference nits
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:58:03 -0000
Hi there,
checking with
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629xslt.html#checking-references>:
Normative References:
RFC1035: [STANDARD] (-> STD0013) ok
RFC1594: [INFORMATIONAL] obsoleted by RFC2664
-> Should be updated.
RFC1983: [INFORMATIONAL] (-> FYI0018) ok
RFC2109: [HISTORIC] obsoleted by RFC2965
-> Should be replaced by RFC 6265
RFC2119: [BEST CURRENT PRACTICE] (-> BCP0014) ok
RFC2560: [PROPOSED STANDARD] ok
RFC2616: [DRAFT STANDARD] ok
RFC2818: [INFORMATIONAL] ok
RFC2965: [HISTORIC] obsoleted by RFC6265
-> Should either be removed or moved to Informational References.
RFC3454: [PROPOSED STANDARD] ok
RFC3490: [PROPOSED STANDARD] obsoleted by RFC5890 RFC5891
RFC3492: [PROPOSED STANDARD] ok
RFC3864: [BEST CURRENT PRACTICE] (-> BCP0090) ok
RFC3986: [STANDARD] (-> STD0066) ok
RFC4346: [PROPOSED STANDARD] obsoleted by RFC5246
-> is the ref to 1.1 intentional? In this case the reference should be
annotated, I guess.
RFC4949: [INFORMATIONAL] (-> FYI0036) ok
RFC5280: [PROPOSED STANDARD] ok
RFC5890: [PROPOSED STANDARD] ok
RFC5891: [PROPOSED STANDARD] ok
RFC5894: [INFORMATIONAL] ok
RFC5895: [INFORMATIONAL] ok
Unicode6: not checked
WD-html5-20100304: document unknown
-> Also, not used.
Informative References:
Aircrack-ng: not checked
BeckTews09: not checked
Firesheep: not checked
ForceHTTPS: not checked
GoodDhamijaEtAl05: not checked
draft-ietf-tls-ssl-version3: ID does not exist
-> please add "-00" to the seriesInfo/@value.
JacksonBarth2008: not checked
owaspTLSGuide: not checked
RFC0793: [STANDARD] (-> STD0007) ok
RFC2396: [DRAFT STANDARD] obsoleted by RFC3986
-> not used in the spec
SunshineEgelmanEtAl09: not checked
UTS46: not checked
WD-wsc-ui-20100309: document unknown
-> recommended ref:
<reference anchor='REC-wsc-ui-20100812'
target='http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-wsc-ui-20100812/'>
<front>
<title>Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines</title>
<author fullname='Thomas Roessler' surname='Roessler' initials='T. '/>
<author fullname='Anil Saldhana' surname='Saldhana' initials='A. '/>
<date year='2010' month='August' day='12'/>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='W3C Recommendation' value='REC-wsc-ui-20100812'/>
<annotation>
Latest version available at
<eref target='http://www.w3.org/TR/wsc-ui/'/>.
</annotation>
</reference>
WEBSEC: not checked
Best regards, Julian
- [websec] draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-0… Julian Reschke