Background and proposed next steps … Adopted as a CCAMP Working Group document in April 2005 Authors think that the draft is quite stable in term of content Requires a new pass on the text to incorporate comments received from Adrian and Jean-Louis Sections to clarify, text to be removed, … Security section must be fleshed out One open issue: ID states: If the hop is in the TED => no issue if the hop is not in the TED *and* does not have IP reachability => computation fails. Issue ? Hop is *not* in the TED but IP reachability (case of separate data and control plane?) Plans … get WG feed-back on the questions above, resolve text issues and republish for WG LC. |