IETF-88 Proceedings

Introduction  |  Area, Working Goup & BoF Reports  |  Plenaries  |  Training  |  Internet Research Task Force

Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (bfd) (WG)

Minutes   |   Audio Archives  |   Jabber Logs  |   Mailing List Archives

Additional information is available at


Routing Area Area Director(s):

Routing Area Advisor

Technical Advisor(s)

Meeting Slides:

Blue Sheets:


Request for Comments:

Charter (as of 2013-12-06):

The BFD Working Group is chartered to standardize and support the
bidirectional forwarding detection protocol (BFD) and its extensions. A
core goal of the working group is to standardize BFD in the context of
IP routing, or protocols such as MPLS that are based on IP routing, in a
way that will encourage multiple, inter-operable vendor implementations.
The Working Group will also provide advice and guidance on BFD to other
working groups or standards bodies as requested.

BFD is a protocol intended to detect faults in the bidirectional path
between two forwarding engines, including physical interfaces,
subinterfaces, data link(s), and to the extent possible the forwarding
engines themselves, with potentially very low latency. It operates
independently of media, data protocols, and routing protocols. An
additional goal is to provide a single mechanism that can be used for
liveness detection over any media, at any protocol layer, with
a wide range of detection times and overhead, to avoid a proliferation
of different methods.

Important characteristics of BFD include:

- Simple, fixed-field encoding to facilitate implementations in

- Independence of the data protocol being forwarded between two systems.
BFD packets are carried as the payload of whatever encapsulating
protocol is appropriate for the medium and network.

- Path independence: BFD can provide failure detection on any kind of
path between systems, including direct physical links, virtual
circuits, tunnels, MPLS LSPs, multihop routed paths, and
unidirectional links (so long as there is some return path, of

- Ability to be bootstrapped by any other protocol that automatically
forms peer, neighbor or adjacency relationships to seed BFD endpoint

The working group is chartered to complete the following work items:

1. Develop the MIB module for BFD and submit it to the IESG for
publication as a Proposed Standard.

2a. Provide a generic keying-based cryptographic authentication
mechanism for the BFD protocol in discussion with the KARP working
group. This mechanism will support authentication through a key
identifier for the BFD session's Security Association rather than
specifying new authentication extensions.

2b. Provide extensions to the BFD MIB in support of the generic keying-
based cryptographic authentication mechanism.

2c. Specify cryptographic authentication procedures for the BFD protocol
using HMAC-SHA-256 (possibly truncated to a smaller integrity check
value but not beyond commonly accepted lengths to ensure security) using
the generic keying-based cryptographic authentication mechanism.

3. Provide an extension to the BFD core protocol in support of point-to-
multipoint links and networks.

4. Assist the MPLS working group in the standardization of the BFD
protocol for MPLS-TP. The preferred solution will be interoperable with
the current BFD specification.

5. Provide one or more mechanisms to run BFD over Link Aggregation Group

6. Provide an informational document to recommend standardized timers
and timer operations for BFD when used in different applications.

The working group will maintain a relationship with the KARP and MPLS
working groups, and will communicate with the IEEE with respect to BFD
over LAGs.

Internet SocietyAMSHome - Tools Team - Datatracker - Web Site Usage Statistics - IASA - IAB - RFC Editor - IANA - IRTF - IETF Trust - ISOC - Store - Contact Us
Secretariat services provided by Association Management Solutions, LLC (AMS).
Please send problem reports to: